← Back to Gadget Pulse US
Samsung's Foldable Empire Is About to Get Crushed by Apple
Persona #3 · Vol: 1000
Remember when Samsung spent a decade convincing us that foldable phones were the future? Peeling back the screen protector like it was a warning label from God, watching that crease deepen with every swipe, paying $1,800 to beta test a hinge. Good times. Well, according to the rumor mill that never sleeps, Apple is finally waltzing into the foldable arena, and Samsung should probably start drafting its apology tweet now.
The latest chatter from supply chain leakers—the same people who've been "confirming" an Apple foldable since 2019—suggests Cupertino is eyeing a 2026 or 2027 launch. A foldable iPhone. The device that will make every Galaxy Z Fold owner stare at their phone's visible seam and whisper, "Was I... a guinea pig?"
Samsung's foldable division has been coasting on being first. First to market, first to ship, first to charge luxury car money for a device that develops a screen crease you could park a Hot Wheels in. And for a while, that worked. The Galaxy Z Flip became a status symbol for people who wanted to look like they were living in 2030 while texting "on my way!" in 2024. But "first" only matters until "best" shows up.
Enter Apple, the company that famously shows up late to every party, drinks all the punch, and somehow gets named party host. The iPod wasn't the first MP3 player. The iPhone wasn't the first smartphone. The Apple Watch wasn't the first smartwatch. And yet here we are, with Samsung's foldable market share looking like a Jenga tower during an earthquake.
Why? Because Apple doesn't sell hardware. It sells identity. Samsung sells a folding screen. Apple will sell "the future of communication." Samsung's marketing says "look, it folds!" Apple's marketing will say "your life, unfolded." One of these makes you feel like an engineer. The other makes you feel like a visionary. Guess which one Americans will pay $2,000 for.
There's also the ecosystem stranglehold. Samsung's foldables run Android, which means they're competing with every other Android slab on the shelf. Apple's foldable will run iOS, which means it only competes with itself. That's not a fight. That's a coronation.
And let's talk about the crease. Samsung has spent six generations trying to make us forget it exists. Apple's version will reportedly use a different hinge design and a crease-free display, which is corporate speak for "we waited until the technology didn't suck." Samsung early adopters, meanwhile, are left holding a $1,800 reminder that being first is just being first in line for the bugs.
The real loser here isn't Samsung's revenue. It's Samsung's narrative. For years, the company positioned itself as the innovator, the risk-taker, the one brave enough to ship weird form factors while Apple played it safe. That story dies the moment Tim Cook walks on stage, unfolds a phone, and says "one more thing." Suddenly Samsung isn't the pioneer. It's the warm-up act.
Could Samsung hold the line? Sure. It has the manufacturing muscle, the carrier relationships, and a loyal base of Android diehards who'd rather switch to carrier pigeons than buy an iPhone. But the mainstream market doesn't care about loyalty. It cares about status, simplicity, and not having to explain to your friends why your screen looks like a folded piece of paper.
Apple doesn't need to outsell Samsung's foldables on day one. It just needs to show up, be good enough, and let the ecosystem do the rest. Samsung spent years building a category. Apple will spend one keynote redefining it. That's not a competition. That's a hostile takeover with better branding.
**The Take:** Samsung's foldable lead was always borrowed time, and Apple just called in the loan. Being first to a category means nothing if you're not the one who makes it mainstream.